Republicans throw justice for Epstein victims aside in favor of ‘one-sided political hit job’
ALSO INSIDE: How Rep. Boebert used campaign funds to pay $20K in back taxes.
Cam here 👋 bringing you your daily dose of what people are doing – good, bad, and otherwise – in the world of politics. We’re diving into the stories you won’t see anywhere else. And remember, you can also keep up with me over on TikTok and Bluesky.
While I never plan to keep any information behind a paywall, I am considering setting up paid subscriptions so you can support my reporting directly. If that’s something you’re interested in and able to do, let me know by making a pledge to sign up for a paid subscription in the future, so I can see if that’s a viable financial option.
Since day one of Trump’s political career, people have desperately attempted to normalize his absurd abuses of power and blatant corruption – and 10 years later, much of corporate media remains a victim of their own attempts to return to a sense of normalcy.
It’s time to stop sane-washing the insanity.
What Happened
Congress on Wednesday formally abandoned the pursuit of justice for those harmed by Jeffrey Epstein’s international sex trafficking operation and instead voted to use Epstein’s crimes as a tool to attack political opponents of President Donald Trump.
Members of the House Oversight Committee voted on contempt charges for three individuals accused of impeding its investigation into Epstein: former US President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and US Attorney General Pam Bondi. Last year, the committee subpoenaed the Clintons, to provide testimony regarding their relationship with Epstein, and Bondi, to deliver the unredacted Epstein files to the committee.
All three failed to comply with the subpoenas, but the committee only voted to refer contempt charges for the Clintons to the full House.
“I challenged my Republican colleagues to put their money where their mouth is and pass my amendment to hold Pam Bondi in civil contempt of Congress. They refused,” US Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) told COURIER. “I will continue to push for justice using all tools available and hold anyone accountable for enabling, protecting, or participating in Epstein’s abuse of women and girls.”
While the subpoenas were issued at the same time and relate to the same issue, the only factor that separates Bondi’s situation from the Clintons’ is political affiliation. In both instances, the parties in question attempted to negotiate the terms of their cooperation in ways that left committee members unsatisfied.
Bondi has publicly released only a small portion of the Justice Department’s 5 million Epstein-related documents, and has delivered none of the unredacted files to the committee, as directed. The Clintons offered a compromise to testify before the two leading committee members from both parties. Bondi’s actions granted her a pass; the Clintons’, a referral for imprisonment.
The stark double standard makes clear that Republicans’ feigned desire for transparency into Epstein’s criminal operation has little to do with justice for its victims and far more to do with political weaponization. In addition to Congress’ exclusive focus on Democrats with alleged ties to Epstein, the DOJ has spent a fortune of taxpayer dollars transforming the files into both a sword and a shield for Trump.
“It has never been about the victims. It’s about powerful men covering up for each other, and that cover-up continues,” said Lisa Bloom, an attorney representing several of Epstein’s victims. “Shame on all those who are obstructing the victims getting the full release of all the files that they deserve.”
In March 2025, Bondi assigned more than 1,000 federal agents to work around the clock cataloguing the names of every powerful and influential person named in the documents. They then redacted mentions of Trump in anticipation of a public release. Once the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed and the DOJ released a small sample of documents, however, it was discovered that these redactions could be undone. The information concealed by those long, black bars had nothing to do with Epstein’s victims and instead appeared aimed at hiding any ties to his accomplices.
Bondi stopped the already-slow release of the files as soon as their redactions were exposed, and has since argued in court that her department should not be subject to consequence or accountability on the matter. The courts agreed, as did Congress, which rejected the contempt charges proposed by Lee.
“Since August, the Department of Justice has defied the bipartisan subpoena I forced in the Oversight Committee to release the full, unredacted Jeffery Epstein files. Without the full files, we cannot know who might have legitimate knowledge and who might be culpable—and we wouldn’t have to speculate,” said Lee. “We should be addressing all the bad actors in this investigation, not cherry picking them for political points.”
But the partisan weaponization of the Epstein files is perhaps most apparent in the case of HIllary Clinton, who had never met Epstein and was a private citizen during the government’s investigation. At best, she is once again catching strays meant for her husband — but as Trump’s original political nemesis, her contempt charges are congressional Republicans’ attempt to help the president fulfill his original campaign promise to “lock her up.”
The contempt referrals were gifted a veneer of bipartisanship, however, by a handful of Democrats on the committee who were determined to play by a set of rules that no longer apply. Nine Democrats signed off on the contempt charges for Bill Clinton, and three for Hillary. Not a single Republican voted to hold Bondi in contempt, reinforcing the perception that the effort was nothing more than a partisan witch hunt, while the charges against the Clintons are being applauded as a bipartisan pursuit of justice.
“No one is above the law,” US Rep Nancy Mace (R-SC) said before the vote. “I want to ask my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to stop playing politics with justice. Not a single one of you voted for your own party to be held in contempt.”
Meanwhile, Republicans have refused to subpoena — or even request testimony from — Trump, a longtime friend of Epstein whose Florida resort was used as a scouting location to groom and trafficking young girls by convicted Epstein accomplice Ghislane Maxwell.
Attempts to Sanewash
House Panel Votes to Hold Clintons in Contempt in Epstein Inquiry
House panel approves Clinton contempt of Congress resolutions with help from Democrats
9 Democrats join GOP in voting to hold Bill Clinton in contempt
Far-Right Spin
The Monkey’s Paw Turns: Dems Dump Clintons Over Epstein Files
Bill and Hillary Clinton could be JAILED after US Congress vote
Clintons Lose It In Berserk Statement Over Epstein Investigation Into Them
New Series From COURIER: ‘Gloves Off’ with Tara McGowan
If one boxing-themed series wasn’t enough, I’ve got some good news: COURIER Publisher Tara McGowan’s “Gloves Off” launched this week! For inaugural episode, McGowan steps into the ring with US Senate candidate Rep. Jasmine Crockett, where they have a candid, yet hopeful conversation about power, courage, and what real leadership actually looks like.
Stream the first episode now on YouTube, Spotify or Apple Podcasts — or just watch the video below.
It’s easy for individual members of Congress to get overlooked by national outlets as they quietly skate to reelection again, and again, and again. The following is an overview of different congressional representatives you may not have heard of, with fun facts about their origin stories they’ve tried to keep out of the public narrative.
US Rep. Lauren Boebert, Colorado’s 4th Congressional District
Since taking office in 2021, Rep. Boebert has:
Seen her net worth fluctuate around $83,000
Sponsored 146 bills
Authored one bill that was signed into law and one vetoed by Trump over her support of releasing the Epstein Files
Voted in favor of contempt charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton and against charges for Pam Bondi for the same violation
Spent her first week in Congress cheering on the Jan. 6 insurrection, almost getting her colleagues killed, and voting to overturn the 2020 presidential election results
Filed three articles of impeachment: two against Joe Biden and one against Kamala Harris
Closed her gun-themed restaurant, Shooters Grill, after the landlord refused to renew her lease
Won reelection in 2022 by just 546 votes, then switched districts ahead of the 2024 election
Called the Biden administration Nazis and Rep. Ilhan Omar a terrorist
Fun Facts
When all the trappings of power and prominence are stripped away, one thing about Rep. Boebert’s political ambitions is clear: she’s not in it to get rich.
Boebert is by-the-books broke, and she has a history of using campaign funds to get out of financial jams. When she stepped away from being a full-time restaurateur to run for Congress in 2020, Shooters Grill was already drowning. The bar operated at a $240,000 loss in 2018 and owed over $20,000 in back taxes.
Business losses can be written off through bankruptcy, but tax liens can’t. Boebert is alleged to have found a workaround using campaign funds, reimbursing herself for roughly 39,000 miles of driving over the course of a few months– an amount that curiously came out to just enough to cover the cost of her tax bill. Boebert was caught misusing campaign funds again in 2021, when she used Venmo to pay her restaurant’s rent of over $6,500 from her campaign bank account. When the building was sold a few years later, the new owner decided not to renew her lease.
In 2023, a theater in Denver ejected the sitting congresswoman for illegally vaping indoors during a showing of “Beetlejuice.” When Boebert denied it, the theater released security footage showing her doing exactly what was described (and more): blowing vape clouds on the elderly couple in front of her, recording the movie with her phone with the flash on, and groping her date.
To make things messier, the man she was with wasn’t her husband. Boebert claimed this was her first date since she and her spouse had separated, but got outed by a drag queen who performed at her paramour’s restaurant and had spotted the two together romantically for months.
At this point, “messy” could be considered mere branding for a Christian nationalist who has publicly violated half of the Ten Commandments, a lawmaker who has been arrested on outstanding warrants, and an anti-trans bigot who harasses cisgender women in restrooms.
Advertise in this newsletter
Do you or your company want to support COURIER’s mission and showcase your products or services to an aligned audience of 190,000+ subscribers at the same time? Contact advertising@couriernewsroom.com for more information.
Support our journalism at COURIER
With newsrooms in eleven states, COURIER is one of the fastest-growing, values-driven local news networks in the country.
We need support from folks like you who believe in our mission and support our unique journalism model. Thank you.
Great piece on how tax liens expose the broader accountability gaps in campaign finance. The fact that liens cant be discharged thru bankruptcy but campaign funds can swoop in to cover them is wild. I had a friend who struggled with tax liens for years and it basically ruined their credit and financial freedom. The double standard between regular folks and politicians who can just reimburse themselves from donor money is absolutely absurd.
Heartless.